剧情简介
宿身“Chiang Can Dunk” centers on an Asian American teen and basketball fan who wants to be able to dunk, but he soon learns much more about himself, his friends and his family.
宿身小人
宿身“Chiang Can Dunk” centers on an Asian American teen and basketball fan who wants to be able to dunk, but he soon learns much more about himself, his friends and his family.
回复 :讲述的是寡妇林秀妹抚养两儿成家后，发现自己曾经“被需要”到现在“无关紧要”的现实转变，她陷入疑惑。而小她十岁的唯一老姐妹青娥的突然离世给了她巨大触动，已过七旬的她决定要在死神来临之前再次证明自己价值与存在感。在人的帮助下，在“魂”的引导下，在“神”的指引下，她挑战了一项不太可能的任务。在寻回丢失的自我的过程中，林秀妹重拾回家人们的再度重视的愿望真能如愿成真？
回复 :讲述长春市宽城区团山街道长山花园社区党委书记、社区主任吴亚琴与社区居民共同生活的点滴，将生动再现吴亚琴同志立足岗位、恪尽职守、敬业奉献、爱民助民的踏实行动和崇高的价值追求。
回复 :Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
