即将告别单身的你会有怎么样的庆祝活动?故事主人翁Rick的众猪朋狗友决定为他举行一个盛大兼疯狂的告别单身派对。为了要Rick绝对难忘,香蕉线视于是众猪朋决邀请了一批妓女来一起耍乐。另一边厢,香蕉线视原来新娘子的姊妹们也决定安排一个大派对来为新娘子庆祝出嫁,就在婚礼的前一晚,盛装的姊妹们竟误到了新郎哥们的庆祝地方,并被误会为妓女,场面混乱搞笑,最后相方的庆祝活动又会如何收场?汤姆·汉克斯早期出演的青春性喜剧之一,有不少暴露场面。
即将告别单身的你会有怎么样的庆祝活动?故事主人翁Rick的众猪朋狗友决定为他举行一个盛大兼疯狂的告别单身派对。为了要Rick绝对难忘,香蕉线视于是众猪朋决邀请了一批妓女来一起耍乐。另一边厢,香蕉线视原来新娘子的姊妹们也决定安排一个大派对来为新娘子庆祝出嫁,就在婚礼的前一晚,盛装的姊妹们竟误到了新郎哥们的庆祝地方,并被误会为妓女,场面混乱搞笑,最后相方的庆祝活动又会如何收场?汤姆·汉克斯早期出演的青春性喜剧之一,有不少暴露场面。
回复 :A man is waiting in his hut in the desolate expanse of the Russian Arctic. He is holding out in order to observe a natural event that occurs here, every year. But ocean warming is taking its toll.
回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb
回复 :