该片另一个比较耸人听闻的标题叫做“德·拉·科鲁兹的罪恶一生”，反贪风暴听来令人误以为是又一部以犯罪凶杀来刺激感官的电影，反贪风暴其实是对大众刊物标题的戏仿，影片内容大相径庭。富家子科鲁兹幼年即受到一个幻觉因果的诅咒：当他摇动一个八音盒时，他所厌恶的家庭教师中流弹身亡。当他成年后，再次偶遇童年八音盒，周围的人离奇地按照他幻觉图景，一一毙命。他成了一个没有犯罪行为的罪犯。该片是布努埃尔大师创作中期的作品，技巧圆熟，但长期被认为是他的二流之作，缺乏早期的锐气和晚期的嘲讽精神，但后来又重新被评价为大师最富魅力的杰作之一。
李子晗
回复 :Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
陈秀雯
回复 :1932年后，日军陆续占领上海多个区域，曾经繁华十里洋场沦为一座黑暗笼罩下孤城，在抗日浪潮推动下，各界爱国人士殒身不逊奋起反击，接连狙杀多名日军官员，引起了日方高度警惕。 故事以一场在新世界“精心策划”的告别宴为由，各界爱国人士纷纷乔装进入生日宴服务团队，其中负责传递重要情报的，就是混入制衣部门给大佐夫人缝制“瑞鹤”和服的一群旗袍师傅。 一代旗袍宗师孙添保，恪守旗袍风骨，一身正气，宁身死，不为日本人制旗袍，门徒三人，大师兄范立饶、二师姐孔绘心、小师弟张仲亭，身份成谜，正反难分。 一次围绕日本人的“暗杀”行动,一场迷雾重生的“局中局”，谁才是真正“卧底”，谁才是最后的“胜者”？
回复 :雷是一名成功的律师，有一家自己的律师事务所。一天在电视新闻中看到一起谋杀案，雷对此产生兴趣。没多久谋杀案的嫌疑人多夫蒂夫人找上门来，希望雷可以为自己辩护，如果成功脱罪将付给他高额的报酬。进行了一番调查之后，雷发现这起谋杀案里有诸多蹊跷，多夫蒂夫人对真相有所隐瞒。雷跟踪多夫蒂来到一栋别墅，发现多夫蒂与她丈夫的财务律师有染。多夫蒂将真相告诉雷，并答应雷在案件结束后两人远走高飞。法庭上雷成功为多夫蒂脱罪，案件胜诉。这一切都被铂金斯警探看在眼里，他来到雷家门口，看见了自己多年来一直迷惑的一幕。他冲进雷的家门，并且开枪了。原来这一切都是雷设计的，就是为了引出藏在背后的铂金斯，铂金斯被助手开枪打死，沉寂多年的冤案也终于真相大白，雷的复仇计划也终于实现。
